シャカ・ヒスロップとクレイグ・バーリー、エドゥアール・メンディ=ジャロッド・ボーウェンの無効ゴールについて熱く議論 | ESPN FC #ESPN ✔ ESPN+ に登録: http://espnplus.com/soccer/youtube ✔ YouTube で ESPN FC に登録: http://bit.ly/SUBSCRIBEtoESPNFC

Share.

49 Comments

  1. You don’t try to “leave something on the keeper” by grazing him with the top of your toes… That call was embarrassing and so was how Mendy got rewarded for that act he put on.

  2. It’s so disappointing that people who think they know soccer better come out to say such that contact on Mendy is not a foul, this is so sucking

  3. …I dont see how it is a foul. The keeper spilled the ball and fell down in front of someone running at him, the person running at him jumped over him but the edge of his foot grazed his stomach, with little to no force being put downwards from the runner onto the keeper. Then the keeper grabbed his face and faked an injury because he realized he was being scored on.

  4. I'm neutral but here's my 2 cents:

    If you watch in slo – mo, Bowen jumped early hoping to clear Mendy. Mendy goes down but slides forward as Bowen is in the air and already on the way down. This shortens the distance of Mendy's shoulder to Bowen trailing leg.

    It would have been nearly impossible for Bowen to have reacted in time and to have lifted his leg up.

    Therefore no foul. That's my humble opinion.

  5. I dnt understand how people can debate thats not a foul…thats was clear foul…he cud have jumped him…how did your leading leg manage to jump the keeeper n the trailing leg fail to

  6. There is no way Criag Burley was a former Chelsea player. He must have hated is time there cause he is 90% negative towards CFC even when they win other games that man hate Chelsea

  7. It's super painful when the underside of a football boot hits or rubs with sensitive skin. It was 100% foul, he made contact with the keeper without touching the ball, the refree's decision is 100% right.

  8. It's a foul- Bowen ran into Mendy and completely missed the ball. I have no idea why this is controversial. Is it because a GK is involved?

  9. so if the player got to the ball first and goalkeeper touches the trailing leg – penalty
    but if the goalkeeper got to the ball first and players trailing leg touches the goalkeeper – not a foul?
    hmm…

  10. I hate football, more specifically, when I receive recommendations for a subject I could care less about. Simply atrocious.

  11. I think we should ask former Goalies and current goalies if its a foul. only them have been in that position getting kicked in the stomach

  12. OMGGGGG FINALLY SOMEONE IN THE MEDIA WHO GETS IT! BOWEN TRIED TO LEAVE A LEG IN ON THE KEEPER, THATS WHY HE DIDN'T LIFT IT! ITS A FOWL! YES THE CONTACT IS SOFT, BUT ITS A FOUL! and i am a arsenal fan who wanted chelsea to drop points lol

  13. Shut up Shaka you are embarrassing yourself…. Keepers sticking together …zabo is right. Mendy messed up as he often does

  14. His foot scraped his elbow yet hes rolling around holding his chest never a foul in a million years mendy has been absolutely shockin this season and this play acting saved his life

  15. shaka's entire argument is that the contact was intentional, so now I guess we're deciding fouls based on split second moral judgments of the players? bowen barely touched mendy (intentional or accidental) and mendy screamed and cried on the floor like he'd been stomped on. that little bit of acting was certainly intentional, and took a deserved goal and point from west ham.

  16. Bowan PUT his trailing leg in because outfield players PUT " a leg in" in case they may need to claim a penalty off the goalkeeper BUT that contact was glancing and was on the arm below the elbow. By the way, this is the exact same thing as when Petre Chech almost lost his life. Forward PUT "his leg in" and went over Chech and unfortunately almost killed him.

  17. It's not just the trailing leg, he showed Mendy his studs to threaten him and distract him. A punch that does not land is still punished or high foot that misses the face is still foul play and penalised. It's dangerous play and has to be penalised. Shaka is right. The player's action was intentional and to be allowed to get away with it would be taking us for fools, but is only fooling Craig. Peace and love

  18. Not a foul. Ridiculous decision. And what I take from Shaka is that if there is contact then it’s a foul. Which is ridiculous, it’s a contact sport for god’s sake. Not a foul and Mende has conned the ref. Not a foul Shaka, goalkeeper association with you!!!

  19. Burley should have went one on one with Frank Lepuff, he actually said literally that a player can't come into contact with a gk. Good job by Mendy on his great acting. He will get what he deserves soon.

  20. It's great when these moments pop up, you really get an insight into how many people don't know what their talking about. Stunned that Shaka is so wrong here, hopefully he's just doing it for the clicks as most of these vids are about.

  21. Your a disgrace Shaka! Any goalkeeper that gets beat from 35 yards with minutes to go in a FA cup final does not have my respect, saddest thing is you was In goal for West Ham and your sitting there saying what you dare saying. 😂😂😂

  22. Let's get honest here if you said to him just before impact here's a million pounds if you get over Mendy would he have got over? Case closed

Leave A Reply